How AI Review Works
AI Review automatically corrects translation errors and enforces style guidelines in these workflows:- Instant > AI Review > Review
- Instant > AI Review > Review > Secondary Review
- Style guide compliance (except formatting and alignment)
- Termbase terminology validation
- Critical, Major, and Minor errors
- Segments with “No error” status
- Exact matches (100%) and In-context exact matches (101%)
Enabling AI Review
Select one of these pre-defined workflows during job creation:- Instant > AI Review > Review
- Instant > AI Review > Review > Secondary Review

Workflow and optimize with AI selectors during the job creation process.
Model Learning
All reviewed and accepted segments are saved to your selected model, continuing the fine-tuning of your custom models.Supported Languages
AI Review is available for these language pairs:Source language | Target language |
---|---|
English | German, French, Spanish, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Polish, Vietnamese, Turkish, Norwegian, Finnish, Swahili, Russian, Swedish, Italian, Ukrainian, Indonesian, Dutch, Danish, Hindi, Thai, Malay, Arabic, Romanian, Czech, Hungarian |
German | English |
French | English |
Spanish | English |
- Unsupported language pairs default to Instant > Review workflow
- Jobs with languages that lack MT support cannot be submitted
Linguist Interface
Viewing AI Review Corrections
AI Review corrections appear with an “AI” segment flag. The flag color indicates error severity. Changes are shown with struck-through text (removed) in red and added text in green. You must accept segments that have been corrected by AI Review. This also reprojects any tags to ensure correct formatting.
AI Review linguist interface
Rejecting AI Review Corrections
You can reject AI Review changes to revert the text to its original state. When rejecting:- Select a rejection category and add an optional comment
- The reason displays in the popover with options to edit
- The AI Review error icon (^) appears struck through

Rejecting an AI Review correction
Revision Reports
Revision reports show AI Review results alongside reviewer corrections. AI Review changes appear with “LILT AI Reviewer” comments and include the error category and severity.
Downloaded Revision Reports
Admin and Manager users can view the AI Review error rate percentage in downloaded Revision Reports. This calculates the error rate over the 80% of segments processed by AI Review. AI Review changes appear as:- Reviewer changes? column shows “Yes” for AI Review agent changes
- Comments column shows “LILT AI Reviewer”
Custom Style Guide Configuration
Configure AI Review Agent with custom style guides to enforce specific requirements including:- Regional spelling and vocabulary (US/UK English)
- Punctuation conventions
- Date, time, and measurement formats
- Language-specific formatting rules
Examples
CJK Languages
Enforce specific formatting and style rules for Chinese, Japanese, and Korean languages using authoritative sources.
Regional Localization
Convert between regional variations (US to UK English):

Have a linguist verify rules and results before full deployment.
Rule Categories
Spelling Standardization- Regional variations (-or/-our, -ize/-ise, -er/-re)
- Specific word forms
- Quotation mark placement
- Abbreviation formatting
- Serial comma usage
- Regional date formats (MM/DD/YYYY vs DD/MM/YYYY)
- Time notation (12-hour vs 24-hour)
- Regional word choices (elevator/lift)
- Imperial vs metric conversions
Example Rule
Best Practices
Setup- Start with critical style differences for your audience
- Use authoritative sources for style rules
- Test with sample content before deployment
- Combine AI Review with human review
- Monitor and adjust rules based on feedback
- Preserve technical elements (
{variables}
,<tags>
, placeholders)
Advanced Grammar Rules
Collective Nouns- US: “The team is doing great” (singular)
- UK: “The team are doing great” (plural)
- US: “I just ate” (past simple)
- UK: “I’ve just eaten” (present perfect)
Benefits

- Reduces manual review time
- Enforces consistent style guidelines
- Scales quality assurance across projects
- Integrates seamlessly with your workflow